Snow and Avalanches in Utah

Annual Report 1999-2000

 

 

 

 

Forest Service Utah Avalanche Center

 

In partnership with:

 

Friends of the Utah Avalanche Center

National Weather Service

Utah Division of Comprehensive Emergency Management     

Salt Lake County

Utah State University

Utah State Parks and Recreation

 

 

 

Copies of this report can be obtained by writing or calling:

 

Forest Service Utah Avalanche Center

2242 W. North Temple

Salt Lake City, UT 84116

(801) 524-5304 ph.

(801) 524-4030 fax.

 

Or view online at:

 

www.avalanche.org



 

The Forest Service Utah Avalanche Center -- An Overview

 

 

Our goal:

Help keep people on top of the Greatest Snow on Earth instead of buried beneath it.

 

Where do avalanche accidents occur?

Ninety nine percent of all avalanche fatalities occur in the backcountry—areas outside of ski area boundaries where no avalanche control is done.  Ski areas and highway avalanche control crews routinely knock down avalanches with explosives before the public arrives each morning.  They have done their jobs so well that since 1980, less than one percent of avalanche fatalities have involved general public on open runs at ski areas or on open highways.

 

What kind of people get caught in avalanches?

Ninety two percent of people killed in avalanches since 1985 have been recreationists, and they are almost always very skilled in their sport.  In almost all cases their skill in their sport significantly outpaces their avalanche skills.  Looking at the most recent 5 years of national data, nearly twice as many snowmobilers have been killed as any other user group, followed by climbers, backcountry skiers, snowboarders and miscellaneous recreationists such as hikers and snowshoers (see charts on page 21).

 

How do people get caught?

In over 95 percent of avalanche fatalities, the avalanche was triggered by the victim or someone in the victim’s party.  As Pogo says, “We have met the enemy and it is us.”  Which is actually good, because it means that, 95 percent of the time, we can avoid avalanche accidents through our route finding and snow stability decisions.

 

In summary, avalanche fatalities occur almost exclusively in the backcountry, almost always involve recreationists, and almost all avalanche incidents can be avoided if we choose.


How we help solve the problem:

We give backcountry travelers the weapon of knowledge.  In order to avoid triggering avalanches, backcountry travelers need:

 

Critical, up-to-date avalanche information. 

We issue daily, recorded avalanche advisories that give the public important avalanche information they need to make their life-and-death decisions in avalanche terrain.   And we also forecast snow stability and weather trends into the future.  Our information helps the public to decide what kind of terrain is safe, what kind is dangerous and we give them useful clues to look for when they venture into avalanche terrain.

 

We provide information on current avalanche conditions primarily through our avalanche advisories.  People access these by:

 

w   Recorded telephone message updated each day

w   Live interviews each day on two different public radio stations

w   The Internet 

w   Faxes sent out each morning to businesses and Forest Service offices

w   In times of extreme or unusual avalanche conditions, we issue an avalanche warning that reaches all the broadcast and print media as well as NOAA weather radio.

 

Finally, we “preach the avalanche gospel” as much as possible to the local, national and international media.  This season, for instance, several documentaries played on national television including National Geographic and several on the Discovery Channel and PBS.  UAFC staff are featured in most of these documentaries.

 

Avalanche education:  

We teach about 25 free, basic avalanche awareness classes each season.  These not only give the public an overview of the avalanche problem, but also some basic avalanche skills.  These classes encourage them to take a more involved avalanche class offered by the private sector.


 

Our Philosophy:

Just because people hear the information doesn’t mean they listen.   Even good information, if presented in a boring way, wastes the taxpayer’s money because no one will remember it. Therefore, we try to make the advisories entertaining so that people will remember what they hear and enjoy the experience enough to use the advisories regularly.  We try and use all the standard tools of effective writing and speaking such as using active voice, first person, examples and stories to illustrate points, humor where appropriate and reading the bulletins in a natural voice, like talking to a friend.  The recorded bulletins are informal, chatty and funny, yet informative.  It also makes our work fun.

           

We believe local forecasters do a much better job than distant forecasters. 

Local people know local conditions better.  They can get out in the mountains every day, they see it from their window and they talk with people on the street about it.  Because of this, we believe that local people should issue avalanche bulletins for local areas, as long as they have the avalanche skills to do so.  For this reason, four crews of avalanche forecasters operate in Utah, one in Logan, another in Salt Lake City, one on the Manti Skyline and a fourth in Moab. 

 

We believe in a strong field-based program. 

Avalanche forecasting is more of an art than a science.  And because of this, computers never have, and most likely never will, be able to forecast avalanche hazard as well as an experienced and skilled human being.   Avalanche forecasting works best when the person putting out the forecast has an intimate, daily connection to the snowpack.  We notice that the longer we spend in an office, the more out of touch with the snowpack we become.  Therefore we always put in one or more field days before our forecasting shift, and we never have more than two forecast days in a row.

 

This is our philosophy and it seems to be working.  More people access the UAFC bulletin each season than any other avalanche advisory in North America, and the number keep increasing by an average of 20 percent per year.  The numbers of people going into the backcountry keep increasing exponentially, yet the death rate has risen more slowly.   We also see an increasing demand for avalanche education and information, not only by Utahns, but by the national an international media.

           

We are very passionate about our work because it’s more than a job, it saves lives.


 

Nuts and Bolts

 

The UAC is operationally separated into four entities:

 

·        Bear River drainage (Logan area – northern Utah and southeast Idaho)

·        Wasatch Mountains (Ogden, Salt Lake, Park City and Provo area mountains)

·        Manti Skyline (Fairfield Canyon – Wasatch Plateau)

·        La Sal Mountains (near Moab)

 

Mike Jenkins heads the Logan operation with a staff of: Drew Hardesty and Spencer Logan.   Mike Jenkins has taught a quarter-long avalanche class for Utah State University for a number of years and he has organized a fine consortium of local volunteers, graduate students and workers.  Their office is located at Utah State University in the Department of Forest Resources and they are all Utah State University employees.

 

In Moab, Faerthen Felix is the program director with a part-time staff of Eric Trenbeath, (who works for Utah State University) and several volunteer workers.  The Moab office is located in the Moab Ranger District on the Manti-Lasal National Forest.

Faerthen also oversees the Manti Skyline forecast, which is issued by Craig Gordon and Eric Trenbeath, both Utah State University employees.

           

Last, but not least, the vast majority of the backcountry use occurs in the Wasatch Range of northern Utah.  A staff of six full time workers cover the Ogden, Salt Lake City, Park City and Provo area mountains—arguably the most heavily used mountain range in the U.S.   Bruce Tremper, in his 14th season, is the Co-Director along with Evelyn Lees.   This season, Tremper spent most of his time working on Olympic-related avalanche problems while Lees oversaw the day-to-day operations.  The rest of the very experienced staff include: Tom Kimbrough, Seth Shaw, Ethan Greene and Jeff Brown.  All are Forest Service employees under the Intermountain Regional Office. The Salt Lake office is co-located with the National Weather Service at the Salt Lake International Airport.

 

Lastly, a private, nonprofit group, the Friends of the Utah Avalanche Center, contract the intrepid Bob Athey as a full time backcountry observer.  Although Bruce Tremper and Evelyn Lees spend most of his time in the Wasatch operation, they oversee all three operations to insure consistency in quality.

 

The Utah Avalanche Center is a Forest Service program under the Intermountain Region and the Manti-La Sal National Forest, in partnership with Utah State University, the State of Utah Department of Public Safety, Division of Emergency Management, Salt Lake County, the National Weather Service and private contributions through the Friends of the Utah Avalanche Forecast Center.


The public can access the bulletins in the following ways:

 

Telephone:

Salt Lake City -  (24 phone lines)                                                        (801) 364-1581

Logan (multi-line PBX system at Utah State University)                     (435) 797-4146

Park City (multi-line PBX system at Park City Resort)            (435) 658-5512

Ogden (multi-line PBX system at Weber State University)                  (801) 626-8600

Provo (multi-line PBX system at Brigham Young University)  (435) 378-4333

Alta (multi-line PBX system through the Town of Alta)                        (801) 742-0830

Moab (single phone line)                                                                     (435) 259-7669

 

Radio Stations (live on-air reports each morning around 8:00 am)

KRCL 91 FM

KPCW 92 FM

 

Internet:

http://www.avalanche.org

http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/Saltlake

http://www.csac.org

 

Fax:

We operate an automated fax distribution of the bulletin for selected businesses and Forest Service offices that post a hard copy for the public to read.

 

To contact our office:           (801) 524-5304  (phone)

                                                (801) 524-4030 (fax)

e-mail:  uafc@avalanche.org


 

Season Highlights

 

Weather and Snowpack

It was a very warm season with very stable snow.  It was the seventh warmest winter on record at the Salt Lake Airport.  The snow line remained about halfway up the mountain ranges for most of the season.  High elevation areas experienced near normal snowfall but low elevation areas suffered a skimpy season.

 

Incidents and Accidents

On a positive note, only two avalanche fatalities occurred this season, which is below the 5-year moving average of 3.4 fatalities per year for Utah.  This reflected the national trend of below normal avalanche fatalities.  Nationally only 22 avalanche fatalities occurred this season (as of this writing).  This is below the national average of 26.  Low fatality numbers are attributed to the very warm winter experienced throughout most of the West, which creates stable avalanche conditions.

 

Media

The national and local media continued its fascination with avalanches.   National television documentaries about avalanches continued to play on the Discovery Channel TBS and PBS.  Most of these documentaries feature Utah Avalanche Center staff featured in a very positive light.  In addition, Bruce Tremper was interviewed this season for yet another national TV avalanche documentary for the Discovery Channel and was the featured guest of the hour-long NPR radio program “Talk of the Nation” and Ethan Greene was interviewed by NPR’s “The Savvy Traveler.”   The UAC staff logged 56 media contacts which include one national television interview, fourteen national television requests for information, two national radio interviews, seventeen national print interviews, five local television interviews, six local radio interviews and eleven local print interviews.

 

Education

Utah Avalanche Center staff taught 54 classes avalanche classes this season, directly reaching a total of 2242 people.  These classes range from hour-long avalanche awareness classes to multi-day Level II classes.  Each of these classes was specifically tailored to the group ranging from grade school and Boy Scout classes to professional ski patrollers and university scientists.

 

Snowmobile outreach

Thanks to a grant from the National Recreation Trails Program, we hired Craig Gordon and Eric Trenbeath, to do avalanche education and forecasting specifically for snowmobilers.  They taught 18 snowmobile avalanche courses reaching 556 people and issued a weekend avalanche advisory for the Manti Skyline, a popular snowmobile area in central Utah.  We hope that this will help to stem the rising tide of snowmobiler avalanche fatalities.

 

 

 

 

 

Use of UAC Products – Changing Technologies

 

Because it was such a dry, warm year, public access of UAC products was down compared to previous years.  With rain and green grass in town for most of the winter it’s hard to get very excited about heading into the mountains.  Still, the UAC avalanche advisory and mountain weather forecast received more use than for any other avalanche center in North America.

 

Because of the rise in popularity of the Internet, we have noticed in recent years, that more and more public access the advisories electronically than listen to the telephone recording.  We live in an increasingly time-constrained society and now that over half the households have home Internet connections and most people have access to the Internet at work, we can expect the trend to continue.  Other avalanche centers have noticed these trends as well.

 

Technology has changed the way we do business.  Although telephone recordings are more personal, about twice as many people access the advisories over the Internet.  And a format that works for the telephone does not translate very well to the Internet.  Web surfers rarely take the time to read a long-winded page of text.  They would rather linger on graphics-intensive pages or bulleted, concise information.   This is especially true with young, Internet and MTV-addicted audiences who are also the most likely people to get killed in avalanches.  To effectively serve the public, we must change with the times.

 

This season, we have experimented with web pages that use icons, images and short, bulleted text to convey critical avalanche information.  We are also experimenting with a GIS display of avalanche danger.  The user sees a computer generated, oblique view of a mountain massif on which the avalanche paths and avalanche danger ratings are draped over the terrain.  For instance, the forecast might call for a “high danger on all northwest through northeast-facing slopes above 10,000 feet steeper than 35 degrees.”  It’s hard, especially for inexperienced users, to visualize exactly what this kind of terrain looks like or where they would find it.  But when displayed graphically, it’s easy to visualize.  Avalanche danger is almost never the same in all parts of a mountain range.  It varies by aspect, elevation, slope steepness, exposure to wind, anchoring and terrain shape—all very hard concepts to describe with words but very easy to describe with imagery.

 

The development of this kind of display has so far proved to be too expensive and complex for our meager budget and limited time, but we hope that we will finally have a version suitable for public display by the 200-2001 season.

 

 

 

 


 

Use of UAC products has fallen slightly this season due to the warm, dry winter.  As Internet access of the products increases, call counts decrease.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Season History – Northern Utah

 

Like most places in the west, it wasn’t much of a winter.  It was slow to start, soon to end and it fell asleep a couple times in the middle.  In addition, at least at the Salt Lake Airport, it was the seventh warmest winter on record.  The snow line hovered about halfway up the mountains for most of the winter and significant snow fell in Salt Lake City only a couple times.  Down in the valleys the grass remained green for much of the winter with rain more common than snow—nearly as miserable as a winter in Seattle.  Elevation was the key.  Higher elevation areas ended up with a near normal snowpack but low elevation areas suffered throughout the winter.  As a final insult, April set a record for the percentage loss of snowpack through melting.

 

Also, because of the warm temperatures, the snowpack was solid and stable for an uncharacteristically large percentage of the winter.   There were only two avalanche fatalities in Utah, one in southern Idaho and only one injury—much below normal for Utah.

 

November:

 

November set the tone for the early season of this below average winter.  As late as November 15 there was almost no snow on the ground at Alta.  Several small storms in the second half of the month added up to about 30 inches of snowfall, with 20 inches on the ground at the Guard Station at the end of the month.  The east side of the range and the Ogden and Provo Mountains fared even worse.  Snowbasin and Sundance were not open in November and Park City lost the America's Opening World Cup races, which it has reliably hosted for a number of years, because it was too warm to even make artificial snow.  On the positive side, the lack of snow equaled a lack of avalanches.  In some years, the early part of the season is a dangerous time, with many people eager to get out despite unstable snow conditions.  This year, with the lack of snow, people just weren't getting caught.  The month ended with 32 inches of snowfall at the Alta Guard Station.

 

December:

 

The snow pack difference between the Cottonwood Canyons and other parts of the range became more prominent during December.  Alta had slightly above average snowfall for the month, at 97 inches, finishing with about 40 inches on the ground at the Guard Station.  This provided decent backcountry touring conditions at mid and upper elevations in the central Wasatch.  The eastern side of the range had about half as much on the ground.  Sundance in the southern Wasatch was able to open with the aid of snowmaking.  In the Ogden Mountains, poor Snowbasin was still constructing their new snowmaking equipment and they lost the entire Christmas season. 

 

Storms in the first two thirds of the month finally produced a few avalanches but conditions were never too serious and no avalanche accidents occurred.  There was no precipitation during the final 10 days of the century, giving a restful Holiday Season to the Wasatch avalanche workers.

 

January:

 

The thin snowpack during November and December provided ideal conditions for developing the dreaded depth hoar, or sugar snow, near the ground, especially outside of the Cottonwood Canyons where thin snow provided the perfect metamorphic conditions.  Then the clear weather at the end of December added a layer of weak snow to the surface of the pack.  The missing ingredient was a blanket of more cohesive snow on top of the various weak crystals.  The first 11 days of the new millennium provided just that blanket. 

 

Most areas around the Wasatch just about doubled their snow pack during this period, although that is not saying much for this skimpy season.  Unfortunately, the avalanche danger also increased dramatically.  Human triggered slides became more common and on January 11 tragedy struck.  On the 10th the danger rose from "moderate" to "considerable" and, on the morning of the 11th, to "high."  In a very tragic accident, a married couple, skiing the lifts at The Canyons, decided to leave the boundaries of the resort and triggered a large avalanche in the backcountry.  They failed to pick up their young child at the day care that night, and a search team located night and their bodies the following afternoon.

 

A couple of warm storms with high elevation rain/snow lines helped stabilize the deeper weak layers in the snowpack during the second half of January.  But there always seems to be a trade-off.  The warmth also formed slick and hard sliding surfaces.  Fortunately a long series of human-triggered slides occurred almost daily, but had no unhappy endings, despite a few close calls. 

 

At the month's end, winter had returned to the Wasatch—albeit briefly.  The snow line was down to the valley floor and the Alta Guard Station snowfall total for the month hit 114 inches, 18 inches above average.

 

 

February:

 

For the month of February, the much-anticipated and well-funded IPEX project set up in the National Weather Service office.  IPEX (Intermountain Precipitation Experiment) funded by a consortium of federal and university entities, was designed to intensively study winter storms in Utah for the month of February—not coincidentally, the same month as the Olympic Games.  Dozens of scientists descended on the National Weather Service office, which we share, armed with a truckload of computers, a portable Doppler radar and storm chaser aircraft—most of which sat idle for during the first half of February.  The normally reliable computer models forecasted several storms that failed to materialize over the Great Basin.  The scientists in charge of the operation were looking rather pale as their expensive equipment collected deeper and deeper layers of dust waiting for the first February storm. 

 

At last a series of storms arrived that became the largest snow producer of the winter, although—and it goes without saying--relatively warm for Utah.  They didn't provide quite the usual "greatest snow on earth" but the warmth did reduce the avalanche danger by speeding the stabilization process within the new snow. 

 

The weak early season snow, still hiding underneath the January and February deposits tossed in isolated wild cards.  Occasionally someone would trigger a slope that would break down into these deep layers, a fact that we grew tired of repeating in our avalanche advisories.  Several people had close calls from these deep slab avalanches and on February 19 a snowmobiler was killed just north of the Idaho border as a large avalanche broke to the ground. 

 

This season's snowiest month finally pushed the total depth at the Alta Guard Station over the 100-inch mark with a well above average 119 inches.

 

 

March:

 

The winter began tapering off in March.  One decent storm arrived on the 8th and 9th of the month, along with several weaker systems evenly spaced over the remaining weeks.  Temperatures were rather warm (of course) and the high sun angles triggered shallow wet slides as skies cleared after the storms passed but generally avalanche activity was at a minimum.

 

Snowfall numbers remained slightly below average 88 inches for Alta.  The total depth at the Guard Station dropped below 100 inches on March 22, beginning an inexorable decline.


 

 

April:

 

Following the tapering off period in March the winter came to an early close in April.  April is often a wet month in Utah, but not this season.  Only 15 inches of snow fell at Alta, over 50 inches less than normal, off by 78 percent.  So what else is new?

 

The sunny days did provide a fine melt-freeze cycle and mostly cool nighttime temperatures gave good corn snow skiing and boarding for the first half of the month.  The warm winter also had increased snow pack densities increasing the quality and distribution of the corn.  But there was the inevitable trade-off; the hot sun had baked off most of the southerly facing slopes by the end of the month.

 

For a seemingly short and warm winter the final numbers weren't that bad.  The average total snowfall at Alta is right at 500 inches.  This year's inches added up to 446, only down by 11%.  But the numbers were very elevation dependant.  The lower elevation resorts had significantly below normal snowfall, especially at their base.

 

The snowpack in April melted at a record pace.  Which didn’t surprise anyone.

 

 

 

 

Season History – La Sal Mountains – by Faerthen Felix

 

September

Labor Day’s customary snow appears a couple of days later than expected, and much heavier than is usual: 8” instead of the expected dusting. Taken as a sign of things to come, this harbinger hits the nail on the head with the timing of winter’s arrival, which was considerably later than normal. In fact, we wouldn’t see another snowflake until late November. When winter finally arrives, will it be as heavy as the early snow predicts?

 

October

The summer lingers, not that anyone seems to mind. Perpetually cloudy July and August gave us more than our annual precipitation needs, so the late-season sun is embraced by everyone. Surprisingly, there is no new snow in the mountains this month, and the September snow gradually fades away, leaving a clean (and stable) slate for winter’s eventual arrival.

 

November

A spectacular Indian Summer persists and, pleasant as it is, it begins to feel unnatural and creepy as the end of the month approaches. Finally, a trace of snow touches the high mountains on the 20th, followed by 9” on the 22nd. Temperatures remain mild, so the snow settles rapidly rather than faceting into a dangerous weak layer. Some skiing and sledding can be done on the Geyser Pass road, but the pack is far too shallow to allow backcountry turns or avalanches.                                                     

New staff arrives at the MLSAFC for the season. Peter Hawkins from the University of Bath joins us as our intern, and Eric Trenbeath takes on the role of Assistant Forecaster and Snowmobile educator for Southern Utah.

 

December

Snow begins to gradually slink in as the month progresses, but it’s more of a fan-dance tease than anything else. A trace falls on the 1st, 7” arrives on powerful winds on the 3rd and 4th, another trace on the 8th. It’s always two steps forward and one back as the new snow settles, rots or blows away before it can fill in the ground surface texture.

4” on the 10th, 1” on the 12th, 4” on the 13th and 3” on the 20th provide enough snow to keep the roads covered above the parking areas. It’s not enough to keep the 4WDs and ATVs out, so tempers flare as motorized and non-motorized recreationists find themselves in close proximity. On the positive side, the additional traffic helps pack the snow on the roads and keep it in place. New Year’s Eve brings the last storm of the Millennium and 4” of new snow, but avalanche hazard remains spotty and confined to cross-loaded gullies way above timberline.

 

January

The New Year’s Eve storm lingers and delivers another 19” before it’s done. Some steep pockets run during the storm and on test slopes immediately after, but even with the copious new load the surface texture provides anchoring and the lack of a smooth bed-surface holds most of the new snow in place, despite weak facets on the ground.

A bureaucratic snafu results in the MLSAFC Avalanche Forecasters being laid off on the 14th. The UAFC sends Forecaster Jeff Brown down from Salt Lake City to cover while the US Forest Service--led by Moab/Monticello District Ranger Glen Casamassa--performs miracles to resolve the problem. What could have served as a convenient excuse to axe the entire program turns into a great day for the MLSAFC as the District commits to create a permanent seasonal position for the Lead Forecaster.

 

During the administrative tempest, 5” of wet, heavy snow arrives on the 17th, ahead of a cold snap that finally creates a supportable base. Jeff presides over the season’s first off-road turns as 2” falls on the crust on the 20th. The regular staff returns to 4” on the 21st and another 1” on the 23rd. Avalanche conditions become devious, considerable and widespread with the new snow load on the fragile buried slab. The straw that breaks the camel’s back comes with 8” of new snow on the 25th and 26th and cold temperatures that chew away at the new snow bond. Large natural avalanches release on virtually all aspects, some stepping down to the ground. Plenty of slabs remain, jus