 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
S n o w
|
C o v e r
|
S t a b i l i t y,
|
A v a l a n c h e
|
I n i t ia t i o n
|
a n d
|
F o r e c a s t i n g
|
 |
|
|

The Stochastic Model of Snow Cover Stability on Mountain Slopes
Pavel A. Chernouss1 and Yury V. Fedorenko2

1 Centre of Avalanche Safety of "Apatit" JSC, 33a, 50 years of October st, Kirovsk, Murmansk Region 184230, Russia

Tel. 78153196230, Fax. 4778914124 e-mail: master@apatit.murmansk.su

2 Institute of Ecology, Kola Scientific Centre of Academy of Science, f. 39, 35 Stroitelei st. Apatity,

Murmansk Region 184210, Russia. Tel. 78155541452, Fax. 4778914117, e-mail: yura@alphais.inep.ksc.ru
|

Key words: avalanche, stochastic model, snowpack stability
|
 |
|
--------ð (hs ð s )
ð s 11
) + --------(h
ð s 12 + r g ( e
1 .eg)h-Ffr cos a2 =0
1 2
--------ð (hs
ð 12
) + --------ð (hs )
s ð s 22 + r g ( e
1 .eg)h-Ffr cos a2 =0
1 2

N-h
s
11k
F = c+fN1-hs22k 2+ rg(en .eg )h=0
fr
|
|
 |
|
ABSTRACT

Three-demensional deterministic model of thin elastic
shell on a rigid underlying surface of arbitrary configura-
tion is used as approach to a snow slab on the mountain
slope. The finite difference method is used for calcula-
tion of stress distributions in the snow cover. Spatial dis-
tributions of snow cover characteristics are represented
as stochastic fields which realisations are simulated with
Monte Carlo method. Such characteristics as snow thick-
ness, density and cohesion were simulated on a base of
information about spatial statistical structure of these pa-
rameters to obtain a stress field over a slope.

INTRODUCTION

The forecasting of avalanche release can be made using
estimates of current snowpack stress field. Such estimates
may be obtained using an information of snow thickness,
snow density, shear and tensile strength and dry friction
coefficient. If values of these parameters are known at any
point of the snowpack, one able to compute stress field by
any numericalmethod and determinepotentially danger-
ous zones where the stress exceeds some threshold level
of stress.
Such simple scheme rarely may be applied to predict
an avalanche release or to determine a dangerous zones
in deter ministic manner. The spatial variability of
snowpack parameters is significant and can not be deter-
mined in practice with sufficient resolution. This fact
stimulate the using of probabilistic methods, where the
probability density and covariations of parameters will
be used instead of exact values of them.

PRESENTATION OF THE PROBLEM

Westudy a stationary deterministic andstochastic problem
of snowpack balanceon arbitrary shaped mountain slope.
The problem of calculating the stress field in a snowpack
lying on a mountain slope of arbitrary shape is in fact a 3-
dimensionalproblem. Beingsolved numericallyas 3D it is a
very time-consuming task. As has been shown in previous
studies (Nye J.K., 1959, Nefed'ev V.O and Bozhinsky A.N.,
1989) the 3D problem may be reducedto 2D if the param-
eters of snow dependweakly on snow depth.
The mostly appropriate coordinatesystem for this prob-
lem is a local orthogonal basis e , e2 , e
3 , where e1 , e
the unit vectors to the two1 vature line at2 are
tangential cur any
point of surface, and en=e1 xe2 . Here we assume that all
points of consideredsurface are non-umbilic, henceat any
point two different curvature line exist. Under such as-
sumptions the stress field governed by the simple partial
differential equations (PDE) of balance of a thin elastic
non-moment shell (Novojilov V.V, 1962).
|
|
|
 |
|
|
( 1 )
|
 |
|
Here eg, is a unit vector represented gravitational force
direction; s
n 1 s 2 - curvature coordinates of current point
(Kor G.A., Korn T.M, 1968); h=h(s1 , s2) is a snow depth,
measured perpendicularlyto slope surface; sij - stress ten-
sor i, j =1,2; p - snow density; g - gravitational accelera-
tion, cosa1 and cosa2 - directional cosines of displasement
vector u=(u1 ,u
2 ) in local basis e
icti 1 , e2, cos a1 = cosa2 =0 if and
only if | u
|=0, Ffr - fr on force between the snowpack
and underlying surface, c-coefficient of cohesion, f - coef-
ficient of friction.
System ( 1 ) should be completed by linear equations
which couple the strains and stresses:
|
 |
|
|
s =----E u
11 1- n2 (------ðu
ðs 1 + n-----ð
ðs2 )
1 2
s12
= ----
E (------
ðu ------ðu
1- n ðs 1 + ðs2 )
2 1
s22
= ----
E (------ðu ðu
1- n2 ðs 2 + n------
2 ðs1 )
1
|
|
 |
|
|
( 2 )
|
 |
|
where E is a Young's modulus, n is a Poisson ratio. Ac-
cording to (Nye J.K., 1959, Nefed'ev V.O and Bozhinsky
A.N., 1989) this system of equation should be solved with
Dirichlet boundary conditions uT =0, where is a boundary
of considered surface.
In order to solve this set of equations the knowledge of
all snow parameters is required. Many field experiments
demonstrate large spatial variability and uncertainty of
such parameters as snow depth, coefficient of cohesion,
coefficient of friction and snow density. This fact strongly
motivates a stochastic description of the snowpack prop-
erties. Thus, other physical quantities in the model, the
displacement vector u and stress tensor s ij also become
stochastic. In the present study we assume that h, r , c are
distributed as a Gaussian random field with a prescribed
expectations, variancesand covariation functions, that are
found previously by a field measurements. Our aim is to
find different statistical moments, for example, such use-
ful statistical estimates as probability to exceed some
threshold value of stress at every point of slope or prob-
ability density function of stress.
The stochastic solution of the problem in this study is
obtained by the Monte Carlo simulation method. In this
method, equations ( 1 ) - ( 2 ) are solved for a large number
of realizations of h, r , c. From the large number of deter-
|

75
|
|
 |