|
Now if, in addition, warmer temperatures later reach the
weak layer, failure toughness and strength are reduced
implying reducedstability since less work is required dur-
ing deformation to achieve failure and the failure strength
is reduced. All three effects (reduced stiffness in the slab
and weaklayer stiffness and reducedfailuretoughnessand
strength) canwork together to reduce stability in this case.

Delayed effects

Warmingtheslab initiallywill increasethecreepratewhich
will slowly increase the slab density and hardness. By the
logic above, stability will slowly increase.In addition,meta-
morphism rates will increase causing bond formation,
hardness and strength increases. Also, surface warming
usually reducesthe overall snowpacktemperaturegradient
to slow or stop formation of facets or depth hoar to increase
stability.

SKIER TRIGGERING AND SNOW TEMPERATURES

Consider now the case of skier triggering with the immedi-
ate effects of snow temperatures on stiffness, failure tough-
ness and strength. Whena skier moves over a snowpack a
dynamic loadis impartedto thesnow cover andthestresses
penetratethroughtheentiredepthof the snowcover (Föhn,
1987). In order to fail snow in a weak layer, a skier will
have to impart significant deformation to that weak layer.
It is not possible to fail snow (or any other material) without
significant deformation even if stresses are very high.
Measurementsof snow deformation imparted by skiers
(Schweizer et al. 1995a,b) show that the most important

variable with respect to the penetration of significant de-
formation is the snow hardness. Harder layers permit less
deformation at depth thansofter layers therebymaking the
chanceof failure less. Furthermore, by theargumentabove,
snow hardness is strongly temperature dependent. Figure
2 shows schematics of slab hardness variations and the
relation to skier triggering derived from the results of
Schweizer et al. (1995a).
Combining the results above, increasing snow tempera-
tures can immediately decrease snow slab stability impor-
tantly in two ways when a skier is present: 1. by decreas-
ing stiffness of surface (slab) layers significant deforma-
tion may penetrate deeper in the snow cover to increase
weak layer deformation and allow easier failure (more
deformation) and propagation and 2. if warming tempera-
tures later reach the weak layer, failure toughness and
strength are reduced allowing easier failure. Of these two
effects, we consider the first to be the most important,
particularly since a person on skis is directly in contact
with the surface layers. Furthermore, surface layers are
subject to great variations in temperature and snow hard-
ness is affected immediately. Therefore, one canexpectthe
stability to vary greatly when conditions are right depend-
ing on the hardness of the surface layers and their
fluctuating temperatures. For example, on a cold morning
or northerly aspect when surfacelayers are cold and hard,
deformation under skis will not penetrate as deep and as
effectively as later on or at other placesif surface layers are
warmer. Furthermore, the effect on stability is immediate:
there is no requirement for delayed effects such as
metamorphism or creep (settlement) effects to take place.
|

STABILITY TESTS

The results above have important implications about in-
terpretations of stability tests in particular theRutschblock
test. Stability tests provide some of the most important data
elements with respect to evaluation of instability in the
snow cover (McClung and Schaerer, 1993). They should
be used as much as possible to collect information to
evaluate potential sources of instability. Below we briefly
discuss some of the tests and the related effects of snow
temperatures and hardness.

Rutschblock test

The Rutschblock test is often favoured because it results
in loading the snowpack by a skier and the sample size is
large. The test includes the effects of the slab properties
and is directly related to snow stability. It implicitly tests
the surface layer hardnessand its propensity for deforma-
tion penetration.However, theextrapolationis actuallyvery
complex. To do the extrapolation it is of particular
importance to consider the slab properties, including the
hardness structure of the slab, which can vary consider-
ably not only spatially but also rapidly in time as layer
temperatures change.For example, it is possible to go from
a condition indicating stability to one of instability as sur-
face layers warm to allow deeper penetration of deforma-
tion and henceeasier failure and propagation. For the ex-
trapolation it is therefore important to complete the test
with a snow profile and follow and quickly assess the slab
properties (hardness of surfacelayers) at different locations
and over time.
|
 |