|
sionally within an adjacent range (e.g. moderate to easy-
moderate). It is not common for scores from different op-
erators to spread over three ranges (e.g. easy to easy-mod-
erate to moderate). This variability of compression scores
is roughly comparable to rutschblock variability where
repeatedscores vary within 1 of 7 steps, two-thirds of the
time (Jamieson and Johnston, 1993).

EFFECT OF SLOPE INCLINATION

To assess the effect of slope inclination on compression
scores, same-day comparisons were conducted on four
slopes where the inclination varied from as low as 0º to as
much as 40º. At each slope, 3 to 5 compression tests were
done at 3 to 5 siteswith different slope inclinations. The
compression scores (number of taps to cause failure) for
each site are given in Table 3. The results for 3 of the 4
slopes are also shown in Figure 4 along with the depth of
the weak layer at each site. The scores on 96-02-13 and
96-02-14 show a tendency to decrease with increasing
slope inclination except for at the steepest sites where the
increase may have been due to the observed increase in
depth of the weak layer. Only 3 tests were done at each
site on 96-02-09 (Table 3 and Figure 4) and 96-01-24 (Ta-
ble 3) and an effect of slope inclination on these compres-
sion scores is not apparent. More tests per site are recom-
mended for future studies of slope effects.

EFFECT OF VARYING CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF
THE COLUMN

During the winter, seven trials were conducted in which
cross sections of columns ranged from 20 x 20 cm to
40 x 40 cm as shown in Tables 4a and 4b and Figure 5. (In
several cases, more than 30 taps were applied to prevent
the distribution from being truncated.) The figure clearly
shows the mean number of taps increasing with the length
|