|
during winter 1995-96 at Rogers Pass, British Columbia, Canada
Jürg Schweizer1, Da vid Skjönsberg2, Bruce McMahon2

1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary AB T2N 1N4, Canada

phone: +1 403 220 7479, fax: +1 403 282 7026, e-mail: jschweiz@acs.ucalgary.ca

2 Avalanche Control, Mt. Revelstoke and Glacier National Parks, PO Box 350, Revelstoke BC V0E 2S0, Canada

phone: +1 604 837 7516, fax: +1 604 837 7536, e-mail: dave_skjonsberg@pch.gc.ca
|
 |
|
Key words: snow crystals, snow strength, snow cover stabil- During roughly the first two weeks of January 1996 a total
ity, avalanche forecasting, avalanche control of 207 cm of new snow was recorded at Mt. Fidelity (Fig.
1). Four major avalanche cycles occurred (Fig. 2). All be-
INTRODUCTION gan withnatural activity and resulted in acontrol program.
The avalanche control section at Rogers Pass, British Co- The snowpack weakness of concern was a buried surface
lumbia, Canada, is responsible for the avalanche safety hoar layer.
within Glacier National Park. This involves the protection
of the Trans Canada Highway (TCH) and the Canadian SURFACE HOAR GROWTH
Pacific Railroad (CPR) mainline and the issue of an ava- The surface hoar crystals had formed towards the end of
lanche warning bulletin for backcountry users of the park. December 1995 during anticyclonic weather conditions.
When avalanche conditions become critical the transpor- A prominent temperatureinversion (Fig. 3) due to noctur-
tation corridor is closed and avalanchesare releasedartifi- nal radiative cooling and primarily calm conditions, had
cially by artillery fire. favoured crystal growth in the valleys, and in particular in
Primary parameters for stability evaluation include up- an elevation band just below the top of the inversion layer
per elevation meteorologicaldata (e.g. to assess snow trans- where clouds (radiation or ground fog) had formed (Fig.
port by wind), index values from study plots (e.g. shear 4). This feature of spatial distribution strongly influenced
frame test results), stability tests from slopes (e.g. stability evaluation.
rutschblocks, hand charges) and avalanche activity (ava-
lanche observation patrol).
The principle observation site is Mt. Fidelity 1905 m DISCUSSION
a.s.l. Traditionalweather and snowpackobservation in the Of particular interest was the reactivity (sensitivity, re-
study plot is supplemented by four automatic stations lo- sponse to dynamic loading) of the surface hoar layer, i.e.
cated in the control areathat collect additional data that is when andwhereavalanchesactuallyoccurredand/or were
transmitted by radio modem to the control centre at Rogers triggered. General experience suggests and measurements
Pass 1300 m a.s.l. where another study plot is located. show that surfacehoar layers canbe snowpackweaknesses
for weeks (Jamieson, 1995). However, this layer seemed to
be critical only for a relatively short period of time.
|
 |