|

ABSTRACT

The geometry of wetting fluid pendular rings in a porous
media can be used to characterize the media in this satura-
tion regime. A number of expressions for the volume and
surface area of pendular rings in an ideal soil have been
published but are not in agreement. A correct set of
equations has been derived for an idealsoil of spheres and
also for a sintered media represented by allowing the
spheres to overlap. These volume and area expressions
allow for thepossibility of a non-zero contactanglebetween
the wetting fluid and the solid.
The transition between the pendular and funicular re-
gimes occurs when either the pendular rings merge or the
capillary pressure (Pc) across the wetting/non-wetting in-
terface becomes zero. Use of the Laplace Equation and the
ring geometry leads to an implicit equation for the P
The roots of equation are in agreementC=0
point. this general
with measur ed values of the transition
saturation.Characteristic curves of P vs. Saturation can
be generated as well. The basis for thisC
is the thermody-
namic relation P=dE/dV. Energy can be calculated by us-
ing the interfacial area expressions and the relatedsurface
energies. Young's equation and symmetry can be used to
reducethe necessary surface energies to only the wetting/
non-wetting surface tension. A spreadsheet can then be
used to generate the characteristic curves.

VOLUMES AND AREAS OF PENDULAR RINGS

Volume and area expressions for pendular rings around a
point contact between two spherical particles (Fig 1) have
been previously published. However, volume expressions
given by Rose [1], Gardner and Gardner [2], Dallavalle [3]
|
|
and Gvirtzman and Roberts [4] are found to differ.
The correct expression for the volume of such a ring with
an arbitrary contact angle between the wetting fluid and
the solid particle has been derived by Frankenfield [5] and
|
 |
|
|
solid is
A somewhat more realistic approximation to the particle
interface in wet snow is obtained by allowing it to flatten.
Geometrically, this amounts to letting the two spheres in
the ideal soil case overlap. (Figure 2) This is still a rough
approximation. The nature of this interface is discussed in
more detail by Colbeck [6]. For this geometry, Frankenfield
[5] has shown that the correctvolume and areaexpressions
|
 |