|
Key Words: HazardAssessment, Stability Evaluation, Intui-

tion

ABSTRACT

There is a lot of literature written about avalanchehazard
evaluation and forecasting, but it's seldom from the per-
spective of a ski area avalanche worker. Because of the
large area of avalanche terrain that they deal with, back
country, heli-ski and highway forecasters usually have to
rely on weather and snow pit data from limited areas and
interpret it for large areas, when making their avalanche
hazard assessments.
Many avalanchebooks address avalanchehazardevalu-
ation from the perspective of back country skiers, focus-
ing on the slopes an individual wants to ski. This is simi-
lar to ski areas, except ski area workers have the advantage
of using explosives and knowing the history of the slide
paths, both short term and long term. Ski areas have to be
very thorough in there assessments and hazard reduction
procedures because the slopes will be opened to numer-
ous avalanche triggers who have little or no avalanche
knowledge.

INTRODUCTION

Back country and highway forecasters use snow and
weather data from remote and or limited sites to formulate
their avalanche hazard assessments. As a result their
forecasts are broad basedand general, usually giving prob-
abilities or degrees of hazard. Whenski areas open a slope
the avalanche hazard is always considered minimal, fre-
quently this requires mitigation efforts. At ski areas,
weather data is used mostly to determine if the avalanche
workers need to come in early or not. Then the avalanche
hazard assessment, and hazard reduction work if neces-
sary, is performed by the individual control teams who are
out on the snow, looking at and skiing the individual slide
paths. At ski areas, avalanchehazardassessment and ava-
lanche control work are many times one and the same.

EXPERIENCE AND COMPUTERS

There is a lot of attention being given to computers these
days. In day to day avalanche work at ski areas the main
use of computers is for storing and retrieving weather and
snow data. Nearest neighbor and other types of programs
that try to predict avalanchesmay be useful for back coun-
try and other types of generalforecasts, but aren't of much
practical use at ski areas. The most potential for using
nearest neighbor programs at ski areas may be in alerting
the avalanche workers to possible old snow or deep slab
instability. New snow hazard is relatively easy to evaluate
and a much more reliable assessment can be made by
humans who are out on the snow.
Herbert Simon anearly artificialintelligencepractitioner
and now a Nobel Laureate at Carnegie Mellon, predicted
in 1957 that a computer would beat the world chesscham-
pion within a decade. It's now 40 years later and last Feb-
|
ruary DeepBlue failed to beat world chesschampionGarry
Kasparov. Custom-built for chess by a team of IBM scien-
tists, Deep Blue has 32 microprocessors that give it the
ability to look at 200 million chess positions each second.
But brute computation is not what human grand masters
use to approach the game. Studies have shown that in a
typical position a human player considers on averageonly
two moves, that he intuitively recognizes from past
experience as leading to the best outcome. As In chess,
intuition is what avalanche workers rely on when making
stability evaluations. Obviously without past experience,
a persons intuition won't be worth much.
General avalanche experience, along with experience
at a particular area, are important aspects of avalanche
hazard assessments. Beingable to observe individual slide
paths on a daily basis throughout the season is an advan-
tage ski areas have, because of there relatively small area.
It is very beneficial for an avalanche worker to have seen a
particular slide path the day before when making a hazard
assessment. It is difficultto determineif wind loadedsnow
is from the previous night or from one or two days ago, if
you haven't seen the path for awhile. This time difference
is very important, because as everyone knows most
avalanches occur during or shortly after a loading event.
It's also valuable to know that certain paths have slid on a
certain layer. While other paths have not and would be
suspect. On an even longer term it helps to know were a
particular slide path usually fractures. This is why
experience at a given area is so valuable. If you've ob-
served a number of slides on a particular path over the
years you get a feel for where and when it will slide. You
learn where some of those "sweet spots" are for different
conditions.
Studies have shown that recognition primed response
is the primary way people make decisions during a stress-
ful situation, as in doing a control route when it's snowing
and blowing and everyone is wondering, "when'sit gonna
open". Or when you're skiing in the back country with a
bunch of friends who are looking to you for guidanceand
you come to a steep slope. You've got to decide if you
should cross it or go three miles around by a safer route.
Recognition primed decisions are when your brain rec-
ognizes thecurrentcircumstancesasbeing similar to a situ-
ation you've been in before and steers you in a direction
that worked out well in the past, or steers you away from a
response that didn't work out well in the past. A lot of this
process goes on in the subconscious mind and is some-
times referred to as a sixth sense, or intuition. This intui-
tion is our brain recognizingapattern in our memory. This
pattern is a sequence of neurons firing in a certain order.
This is similar to a computer, except our brains have the
ability to recognize similar patterns, were as a computer
only recognizes exactly what it's been programed to iden-
tify. Also, our brains automatically discard data it deems
unimportant to the problem at hand. Were as a computer
can becomebogged downin endlesscalculationsif it's pro-
|
 |