|
|
Tab.1: avalanche dynamic calculations, Pontresina - ValGiandains
|

Community 5-15%. Because of the high costs supporting line 1890 m, well above the houses. No damages havebeen
structures are usedmostly for the protection of settlements. recorded. The heightof the snow deposits was less than 1
In the SwissAlps supporting structures in thestartingzone m (Fig.1).
have been used for avalanchecontrol for about 120 years. On March 30, 1964, an avalanchewith exactly the same
Until today supportingstructures withatotal lengthof some starting zone like 1994 had been observed. At that time
470 km have been built. there were no structures in this starting zone. The snow
height was 140 cm. The new snow height in the starting
2. CASE STUDIES zone from 27th to 29th was about 110 cm with a mean
The interaction of supporting structures with the snow- density of 77 kg/m3 . The snow fell on the icy surface of an
pack has been studied for several winters in selected ar- old snowpack only 0.6 m deep. The avalanchestopped on
eas. After critical avalanche periods monitoring flights to the main road of Pontresina in between the houses. The
controlled areas have been made by SFISAR and local runout was 350 m longer than1994. The snow deposit was
responsibles. If possible field visits were added. Two ex- several meters high.
amples are given to illustrate avalanching in defenseareas How can this difference be explained? The main start-
composed of modern supporting structures: ing zone is between the contourlines 2620 m and 2500 m.
The width of the unconfined slope is 290 m and the
Pontresina - Val Giandains, 8/9.1.1994 inclinationy is 37º. At first avalanche dynamic calcula-
Avalanchedefensework above the village of Pontresina in tions with the Voellmy-Salm model without any support-
the Engadinvalley beganat the endof the last century with ing structuresare made(situation A, 1964). The slab thick-
stone terraces and afforestation. In the main starting zone ness d is 0.9 m.
of the Val Giandains avalanche 1360 m of 3 m high steel Then calculations are made for a width of 200 m with
constructions have been built between 1982 and 1989. structures andfor a width of 90 m without structures (situ-
About 25% of the entire starting zone of 8 hectares is ation B, 1994). The slope distance among the 6 lines is 19
protected. In the northern gully and above the controlled m (Fig.2). It is assumed that the slab avalanche started si-
area are secondary starting zones. multaneously on the whole area. In the controlled area the
The Giandains avalanche occurred during the night of slab is separated by the lines of structures. The snow
January 8/9, 1994, after a snowfall from the 7th to the 9th impacts the next line before it reachesfull speed. Through
of about 105 cm on a weak snowpack. The mean density of the impact a loss of energy and mass occurs. This is taken
the new snow was 111 kg/m3 . The snowheight was esti- into account by varying the turbulence coefficient y from
mated to 120 cm, that means one third of the structure 1000 to 500 m/s2 and by reducing the flow depth d from
height. During the period of snow fall heavy winds blew 0.9 m to 0.5 m. The speed v in relation to the covered
from the south. The Swiss avalanche bulletin indicated a distance x can be expressed (Voellmy, 1955):
high degree of danger. v2 = dx siny -m cosy ( (1-e -(2 gª x / dx).
Pictures show that at first a small dry slab avalanche The flow rate Q flowing through the bottom of the con-
started at 2800 m in a leeward slope. Afterwards the whole trolled area is calculated with the smaller speed and the
starting zone fractured, in the controlled area (inclination reducedflow depth. Because of the smaller speed and the
38º, slope distance betweenthe lines 19 m) too. The crown smaller volume of the avalanchingsnow the dynamic fric-
surface occurred along the supports of the structures. In tion coefficient y is increasedfrom 0.25 to 0.27 in the track
the averageabout 20-50%of the sliding snow was stopped and runout.
by the structures. The propagation of the shear fracture The calculations show that the structures reduced the
could not be avoided. The avalanche stopped at contour speed of the avalanche at the end of the starting zone
from 19.1 m/s to 10.0 m/s and the flow rate from 4983

204
|
 |