|
a = -3.0º+0.79b +0.0036X
(r 2 = 0.75; s = 1.4º). b
When applied to the Over the Rainbow avalanche path,
the predicteda = 21.0º (Figure 8). Statistically 21º is a rea-
sonable a angle for Colorado avalanchepaths (McClung et
al., 1989). McClung's study found the mean value of b =
27.4º and the mean valueof a = 22.6º for 98 Colorado paths.
In the case of Over the Rainbow the predicted a = 21.0º
means future avalanchescould cross the parking lot. How-
ever, extreme avalanches would not be expected to travel
beyond the parking lot, nor the distance necessary to
achieve a21º a angle (assuming a flat runout). At the north
edge of the parking lot the slope climbs steeply for 24 ver-
tical meters, effectively creating a barrier that would stop
avalanches. It is the opinion of this author that it would be
unlikely for avalanches to over run this slope. The a angle
at the north edgeof the parking lot is 23º (Fig. 8).
CONCLUSION

The newly-createdOver the Rainbow avalanchepath poses
a real, and at certain times a serious, threatto the Loveland
Basin Ski Area parking lot. From the February 2 avalanche
event several conclusions can be drawn either from de-
duction or inference.
STATISTICAL AND DYNAMICAL ANALYSIS

Statistical and dynamical analysis shows that future ava-
lanches in the Over the Rainbow path can be expected to
travel further than the February 2 avalanche event. Large
avalanches can be expected to travel into and even across
the ski area parking lot. This analysis is also important as
it provides numerical insight to the dynamic forces in-
volved in the avalanche. In terms of avalanche size the
February 2 event was not a large avalanche(299 m), but it
|