|
to temperature gradient metamorphism, and possibly
due to snow melting or settling beneath them;

* fine grainedash particlesmigratedownwards from their
original layer into previously clean snow. Snow pit and
spring observations suggest this migration occurs faster
on more northerly aspects and with rain-soaked snow,
so meltwater and/or capillary action may be involved;
Some of these processes may soften or weaken snow by
snow grain metamorphism and disruption or weakening
of bonds between snow grains or by altering grain size,
shape or texture (Conway and Raymond, 1993).
Depression of freezing points down to -0.5±0.1ºC has
been measured for some ashes (Table 2) and down to -
1.3±0.5ºC in one saturated very weak snow layer (Figure
3). The largest depression measured was for a 1:1 (weight
for weight) made-up slurry of the 17 June 1996 ash but the
dilution factor is important. The -1.3±0.5ºC temperature
could be explained by meltwater in contact with the ash
dissolving more salt as it spread down the sloping upper
surface of the impervious ash layer. The freezing point
depression varied between layers because the amount of
salt presentin the ash depositsvaries according to whether
the Crater Lakewas presentwhen the ash waseruptedand
ash grain size (S. Cronin and W. Giggenbach, personal
communications).
STABILISATION OF ASH-INDUCED WEAKNESSES

IN SNOWPACK

Changes in the snowpack after the June 1996 eruption, in-
cluding formation of ice layers and snow melt, helped to

stabilise ash-induced weaknesses. A clear (congelation)
ice layer formed in place of the slush over the 17 June ash
and bonded it strongly into the snowpack (Figure 3). Clear
layers were observed forming around ash layers as a result
of ash-induced meltwater freezing(e.g. 8-9 July ash layer,
Figure 3). Rime formed thick layers on some other ash
deposits before they were buried by snow. Early snow melt
during warm northerly rain allowed rock anchors to re-
emerge below about 2000 m.
|
 |
|
Fig. 3. A sequence of three snow pits on northern slopes of Ruapehu

during the 1996 eruption period, showing some influences of ash layers

and time on the snow pack.
-
differentparticles of tephra, andtephraandsnow grains
may not bond well to each other because of differences
in particle size and shape;
thin dark ash layers orash particles on the snow sur-
face absorb solar radiationand enhancemelting (Major
and Newall,1989);
|
 |
|
-
ash layers on thesnow surfacemay also cool radiatively
and freezesolid while exposedthere, perhaps influenc-MANAGEMENT
ing subsequent energy and moisture transfer;Immediate and potential volcanic and secondary hazards
-
penetrating solarradiation might be absorbed bybur-were managed by a sequence of volcano and slope moni-
ied ash layers andcause melting but temperature meas-toring,information dissemination including public warn-
urementsdid notprovideconsistentevidence ofthisingsandsignage,andclosureofvulnerablepartsof
(Figure 3);skifields.Skifield evacuation and road closures ensured
-
soluble chloride and othersalt material in the ash de-few peoplewere ableto accessthe higher risk zones around
press thefreezingpointcausingmelting at temperatures the crater (Figure 1). Existing scientific information on
below 0ºC (Table 2) and probably alter moisture transfer volcanic hazards (Figure 1), and management by consen-
by affecting vapour pressure and/or thin films between sus between thedepartment, ski operators, police andcivil
snow grains; defence were effective tools.
Managementof secondaryhazards wassubsumed by the
* lateral spreading of melt (or brackish) water occurs eruption managementat first because existing information
within low density snow or at stratigraphicboundaries on secondary hazards was almost nonexistant in 1995.
(Conway and Raymond, 1993) such as between snow Sufficient information was able to be developed during
and underlying fine-grained and/or frozen ash layers. 1996 for warnings to be issued. Explosives were used to
This weakensbonds betweengrains. Figure 3 illustrates remove weaknesses above some ash layers and test
the presence of a weak, saturated layer of round grains snowpack strength associated with them (Table 3).
on top of the 17 June ash layer;

* weak layers with facetted snow crystals or thin void
spaces develop beneath some ash layers (Figure3) due

260
|
 |