|

to depth hoar development in thesnowpack. See Elder and
Newcomb (1994, 1995) for photographs of the site.
FIELD METHODS

Transects of depth, snow water equivalence and ram re-
sistance were completed in 1993. Transects of depth and
ram resistance were completed in 1994, 1995 and 1996.
Snow pits were excavated during the field work to check
temperature and stratigraphy, primarily to insure that the
snowpack was still cold and had not undergone melt. A
total of 28 ram profiles were taken in 1993, and 81 profiles
were completed in 1994. Samples sizes were 29 and 16 for
1995 and 1996, respectively.
RESULTS

Measured snow depth and ram resistance are plotted in
Figures 1 through 3. Figure 1 shows the cross-slope pro-
files of snow depth, integrated ram resistance, and mean
ram resistance through GAZ-EX 4 and 1. The two vertical
lines represent the locations of the blasters: leftmost is
number 4, rightmost is number 1. Note that although the
accumulation was greater in 1995 and 1996 as compared
to 1993 and 1994, similar spatial trendsare seen amongall
the years. The lines represent smoothed fits of the point
data; point values are plotted with the last digit of their
year of collection (e.g. 3 is from 1993). Figure 2 shows the
down-slope profile of snow depth, integrated ram resist-
ance, and mean ram resistance at GAZ-EX 1. Again, the
vertical line represents thelocation of the blaster. 1996 was sents the location of the blaster. No data was collectedat this site in
a heavier accumulation year than 1993 or 1994 and ram 1993 or 1996.
|
 |
|
resistance reflects the difference in magnitude, however,
the spatial trends are similar. No data was collected at this
site in 1995. Finally, in Figure3 is plotted the down-slope
profile of snow depth, integratedram resistance, andmean
ram resistance at GAZ-EX 3. The vertical line represents
the location of the blaster. 1995 was a heavier accumula-
tion year than 1994 and ram resistance reflects the
differencein magnitude again. However, the magnitude of
the difference is much larger than in other comparisons
and the spatialtrends arenot similar. Notable is the lack of
influence in 1995 when the blaster was not working. No
data was collected at this site in 1993 or 1996.
Investigations of the snowpack at the GAZ-EX installa-
tion in the Glory Bowl slide path on Teton Pass indicates
that:

* a shallow snowpack is maintained in the blast zone
when compared to surrounding terrain,

* the area affected in terms of snow depth is about 10 to
40m from the GAZ-EX legs, dependingon year and di-
rection of measurement, but may be greater in down-
slope cases,

* a weak snowpack dominated by depth hoar exists in
the blast region with increasing ram resistance
observed with greater distance from the blast area,

* the radius of influence for ram resistance is about 10 to
35m from the GAZ-EX legs, depending on year
and direction,

* although effective in removing new snow above the
depth hoar before it gains strength, the GAZ-EX is not
effective in removing the depth-hoar snowpack in the
blast area.
|
 |