|
Key Words: Howitzer, Recoilless Rifle, Tank

ABSTRACT

Withthe depletion of 105, and 75 mm recoilless ammuni-
tion over the last few years, and the recent accident in-
volving the 106 recoilless rifle ammunition causing a gen-
eral uneasyfeelingamong gunners, it hasbecome clear that
new , reliable methods for controlling destructive snow
slides is still needed.Some areas havebeenable to augment
their control with increased hand routes, Gaz-ex, Locats,
or Avalunchers. There are some places however that still
do requirethe useof anaccurate,longrangedelivery system
to control avalanche paths.
Over the last few years, the Washington State Depart-
ment of TransportationAvalancheControl divisionhas been
conductingtests withseveral differentoptions. The 105mm
howitzer, the S.S.E. LoCAT, and the M60A3 tank. Given
the many considerations an agency has when adopting a
new control method, no one system will most likely stand
out as the tell all answer to everyone's problem.
It is our intention, to relay our findings concerning the
M1A1 105 Howitzer, and the M60A3 Tank. Having gone
completely operational with the Howitzer, we have been
able to work through most of the problems someone may
encounter. In addition, having the M60A3 tank in place
and firing under control conditions, we are confident that
most of the main concerns with it's operation have also
been addressed. Topics covered are, maintenance, stor-
age, availability, blind firing capabilities and reliability,
range, training concerns, and winter time operation.
INTRODUCTION

The use of artillery to create snow slides is not a resent
idea or practice. Text found in ancient China tell of ava-
lanches induced by firing crude rockets into areas above
enemy troops. In WWII forces used artillery to start slides
in order to block roads and destroy equipment. The prac-
tice of using mother nature's awesome force continues
today. It's taught to armed forces to fire artillery above
enemy forces into snow fields to cause snow slides letting
mother nature do the dirty work. We haven't tried to
reinvent the wheel, just improve on the moral end of the
spectrum.
Washington State DOT has been experimenting with
military hardware and long range artillery since the early
1950's. In the earlyyears concentrationwas on handplaced
satchel charges provided by the army. This worked well
for areas that could be accessed by foot, however accessi-
ble regions were a small percentage of the total problem
and roads continuedto be closed dueto uncontrolled snow
slides.
In the 60's a long term program was funded by the DOT
in cooperation with the University of Washington to train
technicians in avalanchecontrol andestablish perimeters
|

for research. Each side of the program were kept separate
but cooperation was encouragedwith each other by pass-
ing information and data between the controller's and re-
searchers.
From this program theNorth WestAvalancheCenter was
formed along with the first fuel / air gas exploder ( the
forerunner to GazEx), ground placed snow disrupters
(didn't work), rapidexpansion air bags (didn't work), poly-
vinyl starting zone covers (worked too well), and the es-
tablishment of an artillery program.
The weapon of choice for years has been the 105mm
recoilless rifle. As we all know ammunition is at critical
levels for this weapon system. The next logical step was
adapting106mm recoilless rifle to replace the aging 105's.
Ammunition supplies are plentiful and more up to date.
Adaptabilitywas not hard andwe feltour mobile longrange
control needs were met for the next 20 years.
Not knowing if our goalswould beachievedwith 106mm
recoilless rifles we also requested a 105mm howitzer be
obtained for field evaluations. Weknew from Rogers Pass
experience with this weapon system that it should prove
reliable for inducing snow slides, however our firing loca-
tions were not set up for this weapon system and a learn-
ing curve would be needed to become familiar with it's
capabilities.
Shortly after the introduction of the 106mm recoilless
rifles in avalanche control an incident involving a 106mm
rifle resulted in a death of a technician, putting the future
of the recoilless rifles in question.
Washington State DOT discontinued using 106mm
recoilless rifles in avalanche control and concentrated on
the howitzer and a more recent development the M60-A3
Main Battle Tank, for our attenuated long range artillery
needs.
Research into 105mm howitzers available in the United
States has led us to 3 models, M101-A1 currently avail-
able, M102 becoming available, and the M119 not avail-
able at this time through army assets. Each model has
attributes making it desirable undercertaincircumstances.
When planing the replacement of recoilless rifles we
looked at weapons that could not only match the rifles
capabilities but exceed them in range and accuracy.
Recoilless rifles are mounted on towers throughout
Washingtonto conductavalancheoperations. In most cases
each tower controls one or two slide areas consisting of
several paths. Because of the howitzer's capabilities we
planed to consolidate several towers into one fire bases.
Range to impact areas would increase from 1,800 yards to
in some cases 5.5 miles. This new location gives a more
suitable windowfor howitzer operationusingit's long range
capabilities.
Evaluations on the howitzer were conductedon Wash-
ington Pass in the North Cascades. This location was se-
lected because of its remoteness, high angle slopes, deep
|
 |