|
snow on the ground requires little prior scientific knowl-
edgeand hardly any mathematics. Studentscanmaster the
concepts and procedures in a few weeks. I have tried
numerous other writing andresearch topics in this course,
including human anatomy and physiology, hypothermia,
environmental impact statements, and a variety of case
studies, but none has worked as well as snowpack study
as a vehicle for teachingtechnical writing.
Students find snowpack study rich and demanding.
Through field work, study, and writing reports, they get
the feel for scientific investigation and scientific writing.
They not only gain specific knowledge about the physics
of snow stratigraphy and metamorphism but learn to ob-
serve, record, and interpret data. They learn to write con-
cisely and precisely. Further, they learn to present infor-
mation in several forms for a variety of readers who are not
acquainted with their project. They also learn to work
cooperatively, to review each other's reports, to accept
criticism from their peers, and to rewrite their reports on
the basis of feedback. Perhaps most importantly, students
learn how to approacha newareaof knowledgeandquickly
master its concepts.Unlikemany technicalwriting projects,
snowpackstudy hasstudentsdo originalresearchandwrite
up the results of their own investigation. Student
assessments of the course indicate that they value all of
these aspects of snowpack study.
SNOW AS AN OBJECT OF INTEREST

Much of the interest of snowpack study derives from the
special natureof snow itself. In studying a snowpack, stu-
dents can observe the cycle that begins with new snow
and, after many intermediary stages, ends in meltwater.
This means that they can observe several processes of
change over the course of one winter. Other crystal meta-
morphic processes, such as those that occur in rocks, take
hundreds of thousands of years. Although students do not
see the processes of metamorphism directly, they come to
understand how the changesin the snowpack createstruc-
tures that vary daily. For promoting the study of science
and science writing, this benefit of snowpack study can
hardly be overestimated.
THE GENERAL PLAN OF SNOWPACK STUDY

Despite its technical simplicity at this level, snowpack
study is not mere play or casual observation, but disci-
plined scientific investigation. Students get out onto the
snow, dig a snow pit, observe a snowpack under guidance,
and report their observations.
After this introduction to field methods and report writ-
ing, students studysnow science. The FieldGuideto Snow-
pack Study (Chisholm, 1996) introduces snowpack study,
explains allof the technicalinformation, andgives detailed
specifications for each report. This information, supple-
mented with lecture material derived from the sources
listed in the Selected Bibliography, helps students learn
the fundamentals of snow physics, identify particles,
classify them into standard categories, and hypothesize
persistence and change in the snowpack. After learning
about snow science, the students return to re-examine the
snowpack to observe the effects of the forces of change.
They re-examine their hypotheses to determine how close
their predictions came to actual conditions. At the end of
|
each phase of the study, they report their findings. Thus,
students collect, interpret, andreport their own data from
original observation. This primary research engages stu-
dents in a process that leads to competent technical writ-
ing.
ACTIVITIES OF SNOWPACK STUDY

Snowpack study is laid out in a sequence of ten lessons
described in detail in the Teacher's Guide to Snowpack
Study (Chisholm, 1996). The lessons are segmented and
articulated so that each phase of the unit builds upon the
work done in the previous phases and lays the ground-
work for the following ones. The lessons are arranged in
six phases, as follows:
PHASE 1. OBSERVING AND REPORTING

Arousing and focusing interest

I prepare students for snowpack study by explaining the
aims of the unit, thenhaving them write about their earlier
experienceswith snow. Colored transparenciesof students
using equipment, making observations, andcollectingdata
on field tripsarouseandchanneltheir interest in snowpack
study. Then students recollect recent weather history and
hypothesize present conditions in the snowpack. After an
hour or so of instruction and demonstration of techniques
for conducting field tests and another hour of preliminary
field tests, we go outdoors to observe and test the snow
and conductthe tests.
Field Trip 1: guided observation of a snowpack

Duringan initial hour of orientation to field work, students
gain first-hand experiencewith snow. They dig a pit in the
snow, expose and measure the layers of the snowpack, test
the layers for hardnessand wetness, observe particle type,
width, and color, and record their observations on a Snow
Pit Data Sheet. Having learned the procedures, students
then conduct Field Trip 1 to collect good data. These first
two field experiences are eye-openers; it is exciting for
students to discover that the snowpack is actually made
up of layers of snow that differ inobservable physical char-
acteristics.
Report 1: Initial observations of a snowpack

Throughoutthesequenceof tenlessons, studentsareguided
by a series of research questions. During Field Trip 1, stu-
dents focus on answering Research Question 1:
What are the physical characteristics of the snowpack
observed during Field Trip 1?
Students write up their initial field observations in Re-
port 1, where they present information in tabular, visual,
and narrative form. The specifications for the first report
require studentsto face and resolve all of the writing prob-
lems early in the unit: what information to include, how
to say it, and how to format it. They learn to write only
relevant information in the concise and highly-structured
form required for technicalcommunication. Draftsof these
reports undergo repeated review by both other students
and by me and repeated revision by the writers.
|
 |