|
For this and all subsequent reports, I requirestudents to
follow specifications exactly. The specifications are modi-
fied from Robert Day's How to Writeand Publisha Scientific
Paper (1994), supplemented by specifications for the Pro-
ceedingsof the Eastern Snow Conference(1996), an annual
publication of reports by leading snow scientists. I provide
a system of paragraph numbers to help the students follow
the form.
Specifications for Report 1 are given in Figure 1.
PHASE 2: STUDYING SNOW SCIENCE

Learning the fundamentals of snow science

After the first field observations and the first report, stu-
dents spend about a week learning about snow science
through lectures, visuals, and reading the Field Guide to
Snowpack Study. They learnbasic concepts of snow phys-
ics such as temperature gradients, sublimation and con-
densation, sintering, and latent heat. For many students,
these are newconcepts, but when presentedappropriately,
they find most of them easy to learn and apply. This in-
struction is followed by a brief explanation of snow forma-
tion and deposition and the characteristics of newly-
deposited snow.
Students next learnhow a snowpack is affected by vari-
ous agents of change: mechanical changethrough gravity
and compaction, wind, solar radiation, warm air, and liq-
uid water; andmetamorphic changethroughangular-grain
metamorphism, round-grain metamorphism, and melt-
freeze metamorphism. Both the agents and the processes

of changeare explainedin detailand keptin focus through-
out the remainder of the study unit.
Armed with knowledge of basic concepts of snow phys-
ics and snow metamorphism, andaidedby a guideto types
of snow, students learn how to identify various snow par-
ticles such as settled snow, wind crust, sun crust, sintered
snow, ice lenses, melt-freezeparticles, angulatedparticles,
and rounded particles.
Learning about weather history

After learning about the forces and processes of change
and their various products, students work in small groups
to study local weather history in detail. Using data sup-
plied by Charles Durgin of Plymouth, a New Hampshire
weather observer, they convert the information from Brit-
ish units to metric units. From the data, theydesign agraph
that shows snow accumulation and changing snowpack
depths throughout recent weeks. Then they describe sig-
nificant recentweather events in ordinary prose.
These exercises help students become aware of scien-
tific usage, become familiar with the data, and learn to
express data in several forms (numerical, graphic, and
narrative description).
PHASE 3: HYPOTHESIZING PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE

Report 2: Hypothesizing conditions in the snowpack

Drawing on their newly-acquired knowledge of snow sci-
ence and understanding of weather history, students then
hypothesize how recent weather has affected the snow-
|
pack. Research Question 2 guides their hypothesizing:
Considering the influenceson the snowpack since your
first field observations, a) What characteristics would re-
main unchanged? b) What changes would you expect to
find?
Students present their hypotheses in Report 2--which
prepares them for the second field trip.
Students become aware of the fact that although they
will not be tested on this material--there are no examina-
tions about snow science in this course--when they con-
duct a second round of field tests, they will need to apply
what they have learned. In this way they come to under-
stand what a working knowledge of a topic entails.
PHASE 4. VERIFYING AND CORRECTING HYPOTHESES

Report 3 on the second field trip: Observing persistence and
change

Students then returnto the snowpack to make a second set
of observations. They again dig a snow pit, examine and
measure the layers, andrecordthe physical characteristics
of snow. This time they are guided by Research Question
3:
Which characteristics of the snowpack have persisted
and whichhave changedduring theinterval between your
first and your second field observations?
This re-examination of the snowpack reveals how the
layers of snow particles have persisted or changedduring
the weeks since the initial field observations.
Report 4: Accounting for persistence and change in the

snowpack

In Report 4, students explain how the changes they have
observed correspond to the weather history at the site, and
they correlate their hypotheses about persistence and
change with the actual conditions they observe. This re-
port requires students to apply the principles of snow
physics to field observations. In writing this report, they
are guided by Research Question 4:
How does the snowpack reflect the influences of me-
chanical changeand metamorphism?
Increasing complexity in the four technical reports

Each of the first four reports requires students to apply
appropriate techniques to gather and record information
about various aspects of the snowpack, then to synthesize
and interpret this information for a variety of audiences.
The complexity of the synthesis increases with each re-
port, so that by the time they write Report 4, students have
to synthesize five bodies of information:

1. Initial observations as described in Report 1

2. Snow science as described in Chapters 3-5 of the Field
Guide

3. Weather information from the local weather station

4. Their hypotheses about persistence and change

5. Observations of the snowpack during the second field
trip
Report 4 thus calls for a good bit of integration. Having
begun with the concrete experience of the snowpack in
Field Trip 1, they now interpret the data collected in Field
|
 |