|

Measurements of Charge-to-Mass Ratios on Individual Blowing Snow Particles
D.S. Schmidt 1, J.D. Dent1, R.A. Schmidt2

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717

2 US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station

222 South 22nd Street, Laramie, Wyoming 82070
|
 |
|
ABSTRACT

Determining the electrostaticforce actingonsaltating snow
particles requires knowledge of the electric field in the
saltation region and the charge on the particle. To date,
measurements of average charge-to-mass ratios for blow-
ing snow samples have been made, but Schmidt and
Schmidt (1992) indicate these may underestimate charge-
to-mass ratios for individual particles, due to a mixture of
positive and negative charge in the samples. This paper
reports on measurements of charge-to-mass ratio for indi-
vidual blowing snow particles during a moderate blowing
snow storm in S.W. Wyoming. We measured charge-to-
mass ratios as largeas -208 mC/kg, significantlyhigher then
the -10 mC/kg measured by Latham and Montagne (1977)
and -50 mC/kg measured by Whishart (1969). This large
charge-to-mass ratios was accompanied by a distribution
of positive andnegativecharge on theparticles, supporting
the conclusions of Schmidt and Schmidt (1992).

INTRODUCTION

Wind is an incredibly powerful force capable of moving
vast quantities of snow during blizzards. Deposition of
wind blown snow forms large drifts that hamper winter
travel. In mountainous regions, cornices and wind depos-
ited snow inthe leeof ridgestrigger avalanchesthatdamage
structuresand transport systems. Effective control of these
natural phenomenonrequires a better understandingof the
physical processes in blowing snow.
Wind transports snow by three mechanisms. Particles
roll along the surface in a process termed creep. This
mechanism occurs in light winds and accounts for very
little transport. Strong winds eject particles from the sur-
face in a mode of transport called saltation. Particles in
saltation bounce along the surface, rebounding to heights
typically within 10 cm of the surface. Much of transport
during blowing snow storms moves in saltation. In the
thirdtransport mode, knownas suspension, particles travel
without impact, at heightthat may extend severalhundred
meters in polar storms. Saltating particles are the source
for suspendedtransport, thereforeunderstandingsaltation
is essential to controlling blowing snow.
This paper reexamines themagnitudeof the electrostatic
charges that develop on saltating snow particles. Most
laboratory and field studies of saltation have ignored
electrostatic forces. In the few studies directed toward
measuring particle charge, we believe the methods under-
estimate magnitudes. The remainder of this introduction
presentsa brief reviewof research on theelectrostatic force
and why previous experiments might underestimate par-
ticle charge-to-mass ratios. Following sections describe
the equations, apparatus, field procedures, and results of
our experiment. Our thoughts on the implications of the
results on the saltation process are in the discussion.
|
THE SALTATION PROCESS

Saltating snow particles rebound from elastic impact with
the surface, following long, low trajectories in response to
forces of fluid drag and gravitation. Whether it be snow
particles in the atmosphere, or glass beads in a wind tun-
nel, the equations that describe the motion of saltating
particles are the same. White and Schultz (1977) used a
high speed camera to photograph trajectories of saltating
glass spheres in a wind tunnel. They found trajectories
higher and longer then those predicted from theoretical
equations involving only fluid drag and the gravitational
force. This indicatedthepresenceof an additionallift force.
Lift develops if the particle spins and White and Schultz
showed good agreement with the observed trajectories by
adding the Magnus lift to the theoretical equations. To
produceconsistenttrajectoriesfrom the additionof Magnus
effect alone, White and Schultz assumed spin rates in the
range100 - 300 rev/s. Another force thatcould explain the
additional lift on saltatingparticles is the electrostaticforce
that results from friction between the moving particles and
the surface.

ELECTRIFICATION OF BLOWING SNOW

A charged particle, in an electric field, is subject to an
electrostatic force. The magnitude of the force is equal to
the product of the electric field and the chargeon the par-
ticle. The force acts along the electric field vector, in the
direction determined by the sign of the particle charge.
Schmidt and Schmidt (1992) review the research on the
mechanisms that produce charge separation in saltating
snow. These mechanisms usually produce moving parti-
cles that are negatively charged, while surface particles
become positive. Blizzardmeasurements (Schmidt, 1994)
confirmed predictions by Schmidt and Dent (1993) that
electric fields near the surface in saltating snow are sev-
eral orders of magnitude larger than the fair- weather field
(100 V/m).
Whishart (1968) and Latham and Mongtagne(1970) re-
ported measurements of average charge-to-mass ratios in
whichsamples of driftingparticleswere collected. Schmidt
and Schmidt (1992) also reported charge and mass for
blizzardparticles collectedin aportableFaradaycage,with
simultaneous wind speedmeasurements. Reductions, and
actual reversal, in sign of measured charge during wind
gusts strongly suggested that eroded surface particles of
opposite sign were mixing with moving particles. This
would indicate average particle charge-to-mass ratio
determined by measuring the charge on blowing snow
samples and dividing by sample mass would underesti-
mate charge-to-mass ratios of the individual snow parti-
cles.
|
 |