|

DISCUSSION

The derivation of equation (13) depends on two critical
assumption. (a) Particles fall at terminal velocity, and (b)
the shape factor (drag coefficient) is the same in all direc-
tions. Very consistent vertical distances between dots on
each trace strongly support both assumptions. Measured
variations in fall velocity were random for all traces, and
within the uncertainty of the measurement. We saw no
trace oscillations characteristic of particles falling with a
preferred orientations(as reported for plate snow crystals,
for example). The ratio of longest axis to perpendicular
axis averaged 1.49 for saltating snow photographed by
Schmidt (1981). Saltation impacts and non-uniform
instantaneous drag on such particles will cause rotations
that continue after particle's enter our apparatus. These
rotations should yield an average shape factor approxi-
mately constant with respect to direction.
|
ticles with negativechargesaltating on asnow surfacewith
net positive charge, theelectrostatic force(attraction) short-
ens trajectories. On the other hand,particles with positive
charge, eroded from the surface during wind gust, should
have longer trajectories with higher rebounds. These
particles will have increased probability of suspension by
turbulence. Based on the results reported here, questions
of charge distribution with height, and charge decay rate
for particlesfreshlydetachedfrom thesurface,becomecriti-
cal next steps in our research.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the apparatus is necessarily large, modification
of Millikan's (1910) technique can provide charge-to-mass
ratios for individual saltating particles.
|
 |