|
Key words: Snow slab, weak layers, strain rate, shear

strength, measuring procedures

ABSTRACT

Concurrentmeasurements in situ of the shear strengthand
strain rate of weak layers or interfaces have not been ex-
ecuted up to now. In order to uncover the relationship
between thetwo parameters andto clarify if the usual load-
ing times (0.1 to 3 seconds) were adequateto produce brit-
tle fractures parallel acceleration and deformation meas-
urements were performed. Both additional measurements
show that the critical strain rate limit for brittle fractures is
always exceeded, thus the dynamic loading of a moving
skier is well reproduced by such shear frame measure-
ments. The measuring procedures, the environmental
conditions and the measured shear strength values are
presentedas well as some error sources. Finally the practi-
cal consequencesof such measurements are displayed by
some thereof calculated relationships between strength,
stress and stability.

INTRODUCTION

Slab avalanches are most often released in weak layers or
interfaces. In order to explain a posteriori such releases or
to forecast a slab situation, it is common practice to ap-
proximate a mechanical stability index using values of
shear strength and overburden stresses of the slab layers
measured in the field (and e.g. of an additional skier).
However because the strain rate of these strength values is
not measured concurrently, there is some doubt, if the
dynamic of these measurements is representative for the
brittle behaviour whichgenerally is attributed to skier-trig-
geringof slabs. In order to clarify the type of fracturemode
for our field measurements, we decided to combine the
strength measurements with acceleration and deformation
|
measurements.

EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS

The instrumental set-up used in our field campaigns is
shown in Fig. 1.
The used shear frame is the so called "Swiss" shear
frame. This stainless steel frame has six cross-members, is
sharpened at the lower edges and has an area of 0.05 m2
(0.2 x 0.25 m). The total weight with mounted accelerom-
eter is 0.85 kg.
The appliedshear forcewasmeasured withanelectronic
force gauge attached to the frame with two steel hooks.
The gaugerange is ± 490 N with a precision of ± 1 N. The
stress is obtained, dividing the force by the frame area.
In order to obtain the strain rate and the strain during
the experiment, we have mounted an accelerometer onto
the shear frame. Integrating the measured acceleration we
are in a state to calculate the displacement velocity of the
frame andthestrainrate,scalingthe velocitywith theframe
length. Integrating the velocity we can calculate the
displacement of the frame and the strain (Fig. 2). For one
third of the measurements we have mounted on the shear
frame also a sensor, which measures directlythe displace-
ment. Wedid not use it for every experiment, becausea lot
of time was required to fix the sensor in the snow cover or
underground carefully. The analog outputs of the three
sensors were wiredwith cables to a signal conditioner and
finally to a laptop computer, where we recorded the
measureddata. Thecomparison betweenthemeasured and
the calculated(from acceleration) displacementshow afair
agreement (Fig. 3).
The shear force, the frameacceleration and, when used,
the displacement length were continuously recorded with
|
 |