|
depth readings are the result of hourly average data based
on one minute readings. Furthermore, the snow would
tend to have a greater density and be less subject to wind
scouring anderosion. However, in this situation, the snow
depth also gradually decreases after the initial snow fall,
probably as a result of settling andcompaction of the snow.

SUMMARY

The evolution of automatic snow depth measurement sen-
sors based on ultra sonic measurements is discussed. Data
are presented from the two most recent versions of the
sensors and show how the measurement of snow depth
has become more reliable undervarious conditions. Meas-
urement quality indicator numbers are also now available
from the sensor and are discussed.

REFERENCES

Caillet, A., F.G. D'Aillon and I. Zawadzki, 1979. An ultrasound
low power sonar for snow thickness measurements. Proceed-
ings Eastern Snow Conference, June 1979, Alexandria Bay,
N.Y., pp 108-116.

Goodison, B.E., R. Wilson, K. Wu and J. Metcalfe, 1984. An
inexpensive remote snow-depth gauge: an assessment. Pro-
ceedings Western Snow Conference, Sun Valley, Idaho, USA.
April 1984, pp 188-191.
|
Goodison, B.E., J.R. Metcalfe and R.A. Wilson, 1988. Perform-
ance of a Canadian automatic snow depth sensor. Proceed-
ings, W.M.O. Technical Conference, TECO-88, Leipzig, Ger-
man Democratic Republic. May 1988. W.M.O. Geneva, Swit-
zerland.

Gubler, H. 1981. An inexpensive remote snow depth gauge
based on ultrasonic wave reflection from the snow surface.
Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 27, No.95, pp. 157-163.
|
 |