|
measurements are considered valid in lower sections of Using equation2 the snow movement accelerationwas 7.32
the snowpack. Figures 1 and 2, which represents Sensor cm/hr2 . Over the next 18 hours the sensor moved back to
#1 and 2 respectively, indicate no movement. The nega- an angle of 30 degrees. This corresponds to an accelera-
tive angles that areshown in the figures representa deflec- tion of 1.35x10-2 cm/hr2 .
tion greater than 90 degrees. This is possible due to the The accelerated creep rate from the explosive was a re-
sensors being mounted plum to the slope. sult of the elasticresponsein thesnowpack. This increased
Though problems were evident in sensors #1 and 2, sen- creep rate after the delivery of the explosive charge could
sor #3 produced the following data at a higher confidence signal a weaker snowpack. The delivery of an explosive
level. Sensor # 3 monitors the snowpack in the top meter could weaken the snowpack for a short duration.
of the snowpack. As thestorm progressedsensor #3 showed The ninthstorm of the year arrived on February 22, 1996.
little movement. The sensor was bent at an angle of 35 By 1100 hours the Collins study plot had received 45.7 cm
degrees (2 degrees less than perpendicular to the slope) of snow with 3.38 cm of water (7% density). The winds
and began to declineat a slow rate until 30 degrees. This were from the northwest at 41 cm/hr2 .
tends to indicate that the stress in the snowpack was The heaviest intensity occurred between 0100 through
declining during the storm. At about 1130 hours an 1500 hours. During the storm cycle sensor #3 was moni-
avalanche control team began progressing out to stabilize tored. Figure 4 shows the creep rate began to increase at
the slidepath's around Mt. Baldy. At 1200 hours a explo- 0000 hours. As the intensity of the snowfall increased at
sive charge (2 kg / PETN) tied to a bamboo pole was deto- 0600 hours the creeprate also accelerated. At 0615 hours
nated 1 meter above the new snow surface to create an the creep rate accelerated dramatically. Increasing from
airblast. This explosive created a class 2 avalanche with 33 degrees at 0615 hours to 34 degrees at 0945 hours. This
an crown depth of 46 cm, width of 254 cm and ran 10 m. relates to a snow movement acceleration of 0.124 cm/hr2 .
This indicated some instability within the new snow. Over the next hour and half the C&G sensor showed the
At the time the explosive was detonated the creep rate snowpack stabilizing as the angle of tilt was decreased to
accelerated in sensor #3. At 1200 hours the sensor was 31 degrees. This decline in the creep rate correlates to a
bent at an angle of 30 degrees and at 1215 the angle was decrease in snowfall intensity. However, at 1145 hours
32.5 degrees. The sensor stabilized at 32.5 degrees. Refer the creep rate accelerated to 35 degrees at 1215 hours and
to Figure 3. slowly increasedto 36 degrees at 2200 hours.
From equation 1 the deflection was calculatedas 4.12 cm. This storm cycle producedno natural or artificial releases

132
|
 |