|
|

The Remote Monitoring of Avalanche Activity
G. Statham1, A. Wilson2, J. Kelly3, and R. Bilak4

Alpine Specialist, Canmore, Alberta, Canada.

2 The University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW., Calgary, Alberta, Canada. T2N 1N4

3 SRAWS, Glacier National Park, British Columbia, Canada

4 Mountain Watch Inc. Suite 900, 840 7t h Avenue SW., Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
|
|
 |
|

ABSTRACT

Observing and recording avalanche activity is one of the
most important factors when assessing snow stability and
preparing a forecast. This information is critical for the
optimum timing of road closures, explosives control and
reopening of avalanche zones. Observing this avalanche
activity can bea problem as it requires manpower andtime.
In remote areas or operations with numerous avalanche
paths, this can be impractical if not impossible. Poor
visibility or darkness can also hinder the accurate
assessment of avalanche control results.
The following paper outlines a two year project aimed
at developinga remote system of avalanchedetectionwhich
will provide down avalanche information in real time.

INTRODUCTION

The Trans Canada Highway is the main artery for vehicle
traffic through the Western Canadian mountains. Forty
kilometers of this road travels through Rogers Pass, where
134 separate avalanchepathswith multiple starting zones
affect the route. Temporary road closuresare frequenthere
duringthewinter months, eachoneaffectingthecommerce
of several provinces. It has been estimated that a typical
two hour closure will result in $50 000 of direct costs to
stopped vehicles alone (Morrall, 1992).
The needfor a remote telemetry system indicatingdown
avalanches and hopefully streamlining the timing of road
closures was expressed in 1994 by the Snow Research
Avalanche Warning Section (SRAWS) in Rogers Pass, BC.
Over the winters 1994/95 and 95/96, the authors under-
took a project to develop a technology which would give
real time indication of avalanche activity, be durable
enough to withstand impact forces, would reset itself to
monitor multiple cyclic events throughout the season and
require minimal maintenance.
The system wasbuilt by MountainWatchInc. andnamed
the Avalanche Track Monitoring System (ATMS). The
ATMS was installed in Cougar Corner #6 (CC#6) at Rogers
Pass, an indicator path where conditionsare consideredto
be representative of the snow stability in surrounding
terrain. The information obtained was then used in com-
bination with other standard forecasting parameters to
produce stability evaluations and forecasts.

* Working on contract to Mountain WatchInc.

METHODOLOGY

The sensor was located high in the track of the avalanche
path. It was suspended by a cable which hung from an
aerial line tensioned 10 meters high between mature trees
on either side of the track. This suspension cable could be
raised or lowered to account for the potential buildup of
avalanchedebris. A two strandsignalwirewas intertwined
|
with the 1/8 inch steel suspension cable, connecting the
sensor with a Campbell Scientific CR10 datalogger and a
radio located safely to the side of the track.
The sensor was a PVC encased one piece mechanical
accelerometer with a weighted1.5 meter PVC type 1 wand
attached underneath. The accelerometer measured snow
movements by the deflections of angle off vertical of the
suspended wand. Avalanches striking the wand would
deflect the sensor beyond a predeterminedangle, thus trig-
geringan alarm. The signal was generatedas a dry contact
closure andsent to the datalogger/radiovia the signal wire.
The alarm was a 15 second tone transmission on a radio
frequency and a time/date print within the datalogger.
Deflections weremonitored in the downslope axis only.
An adjustable switch was used to set the optimum angle of
trigger for that particular site. Options were 30, 60 or 90
degrees off vertical, which would prevent site dependent
variables such as wind gusts from triggering the alarm.
A signal conditioner module was located at the
datalogger/radio site. This functioned in detecting the
switch closure at the sensor, flagging this event within the
datalogger and then powering up the radio transmitter to
send an alarm tone. The datalogger was used only for
research purposes to confirm exact avalanchetimes. The
sensor and signal conditioner required no power of their
own to operate in the sleep mode. The entire system
derived it's excitation power from the load carried in the
datalogger/radio to flag avalancheevents. This was a 12v
battery and was continuously available to the signal con-
ditioner since an event may happenat any time.

RESULTS

The first installation of this sensor occurred on January
21, 1995. The angle of deflection was set at 60 degreesand
the base of the wand was approximately 2 meters above
the ground. During the next avalanche cycle CC#6
producedtwo avalanches, the second of the two being the
largest. The sensor indicated only the larger avalanche.
Subsequent to this, the angle of deflection was changedto
30 degrees andthewandheightlowered to 1.5 meters above
the ground in the hopes of not missing the smaller, but
equally important events.
Twomore significantavalanchecyclesoccurredthatsea-
son, with CC#6 producing a total of 6 more avalanches,
rangingfrom size 1 to 3. The sensor indicated eachevent,
and in one instance awoke the Forecaster during the night
who was anticipating the cycle and had set various clo-
sure parameters before going home.
Based on the successful results of the first season, CC#6
was again instrumented for the 1995/96 winter season.
Results from this winter were variable, with several prob-
lems beingidentifiedandcorrected. Durabilitywas anissue
as a large avalanche early in the season snapped the PVC
wand in half and rippedapart one of the connectors in the
signal wire. This was repaired, but soon after the radio
|
 |