|
Snow study pits are routinely dug by the first guide out,
while waiting for the second load. Often the findings con-
firm what we were expecting, based on previous pit data.
We plot significant pits on the standard Swiss style sea-
sonal wall chart, alongwith contributing factors, anda bot-
tom line of avalancheoccurrence. We'vefoundcolor useful
to portray temperatures, using the standard nordic ski wax
colors. Last season we started Xeroxing each month's
portion of the chart, and posting it at other places in the
valley, where backcountry skiers congregate. Our clients
have immediate access to the full season's chart.
Ski tests are often the responsibility of the second guide
out. He or she usually has time to kick a little cornice, or
traverse out to a start zone off to the side, and still traverse
back in behind the clients' fall line route.
Route managementis theleadguide'sresponsibility,and
we hear about it, if he or she thinks our route might risk
starting one down on another group. Skiing instructions
are specific as to who leads, who follows, whether we ski
as groups - or one at a time, how much distance between
skiers, etc.. Typically one guide leads, while the second
sweeps the tail, providing assistance to slower skiers. One
guide may wait out a run, to dig an extra pit or set up
another landing.
The buddy system is standard procedure for defense
against tree wells in particular, but also to guard against
lost skiers in the vast and complex terrain, typical of gla-
ciers and avalanchepath ski runs.

CLIENTS' FEELINGS

Our ability to sense clients' feelings is critical. This is a
continual challenge, and perhaps the area of our profes-
sion's greatest need for improvement.
"My, what an exciting job you have! I'd love to heli-ski,
except that. I'm afraid I couldn't jump out of the helicop-
ter." "Shucks, I figure it's just a crap shoot. That's why
you give us thesebeacons,isn't it?" Or my favorite: "Nordic
helicopter skiing sounds wonderful, but what happens
when you come to a fence?" I started heli-ski guiding in
1983, after about 16 years as pro-patroller, ski instructor,
and snow ranger, and I'm still continually amazed at the
misconceptions our clients have about the natural world
of snow. The Disneyfication of the Western mind is of
course at work here, but those of us that choose to get our
information from more reliable sources need to at least at-
tempt to keep up on popular culture. As revolting as it is,
it still is where most of our clients are coming from. The
Sports Illustrated article about the CMH Bay Street ava-
lanche incident comes to mind as an example of how en-
trenched these misconceptions are. As a forester, I come
up against this same Bambi Syndrome to an alarming
degree. Dealing with it requires patience and tact. You
can probably sense some of the natureof my attitude prob-
lem here. Contact with clients from other heli-ski opera-
tions indicates that I'm not the only guide with this
challenge.
Anxiety management is a personal and complex affair.
Convincing clientsnotto do dangerousthings is mademore
difficult by the fact that they usually perceive heli-skiing
as a highly risky business, in the first place. They often
are people who enjoy doing dangerous things - adrenaline
junkies. Persuadingsuch clients to respect the more con-
204
|
servative nature of most of their fellow skiers, has proved
to be the best ploy with this sometimes disruptive minor-
ity. Small groups help a lot. There simply is more oppor-
tunity for contact with the guide. Hopefully the guide has
his, or her, own attitude problem under control.

ELITISM

Anything perceived to be as expensive as heli-skiing is
going to have problems with elitism. To pretend other-
wise is a perhaps comforting illusion, but to quote the
patron saint of the environmental movement - Aldo
Leopold: "seems to yield only danger in the long run".
A popular misconception among environmentalists, for
instance, is that heli-skiingis somehow at odds with nordic
skiing. Weread about demonstrations in Colorado, Utah,
and Canadaagainstheli-skiing, andmy European contacts
tell of similar difficulties. Except for resistance to heli-
hiking, relayed to us by the U.S. Forest Service, we have
been largely spared these distractions in the North Cas-
cades. We do not have any heli-hiking. Our operation
was, in fact, started by a local group of guides - who were
also nordic ski instructors. So an easy explanation of why
we do this elitist thing, is that " If you can't lick 'em, join
'em."
The truth, as usual, is more complex. Heli-skiing gives
its participants, and especially its guides, the opportunity
to see more terrain, up close, than is possible by any other
means. If heli-ski guides are better avalancheforecasters,
as Tremper suggested, then this is the reason. We simply
are privileged to have more exposure. Helicopters arealso
the most environmentally friendly means to build and
maintain backcountry bridges, huts, and trails. They're
very handy for rescue! If we make the effort to communi-
cate this knowledge to other backcountry skiers, the po-
tential for safety education is the best we could hope for.
The role of avalanche paths, as fuel breaks, in efforts to
restore naturalfire ecology, is but one example of how our
airborne vantage could translate into better backcountry
management. Nobody else sees, or skis, the forest fire
scars the way we do. Nobody else watches the snags go
down, the brush come up,andthe changesinanimal tracks,
the rate that our bottom landings grow in - and need to be
cleared out, or what happens to the forest when nature
clears our bottom landings for us. Don't keep this kind of
knowledge out of circulation. Wehave a responsibility to
tactfully, gently, and as friendly backcountry neighbors,
educate less well traveled mountain enthusiasts. They
just might, in return, allow us to continue to ski. This is
one sound business reason for making an effort to commu-
nicate. I believe there is a moral obligation too - to give
other mountain people the survival knowledge they need
for both avalanche safety, andthe abilityto make long term
ecological decisions based on reality.
|
 |