|
As a result of this change in policy, patrollers and resort
employees (except ski guides) are presentlyrestrictedfrom
communicating information regarding snow conditions,
avalanchehazards and suggested routes to potential back-
country users. The present required responseto inquiries
regarding thebackcountry is that it is a hazardous areaand
travel in the touring area is not recommended without a
guide.
The former management policy allowed the patrol to
restrict users (voluntarily) to certain areas and therefore
allowed access to some areas which were believed to have
a low hazard potential while other areas which were be-
lieved to haveagreaterhazardremainedvoluntarily closed.
This policy was well-received at the time. Under the
present management plan if a gate is open the user is
permitted to access any slope they choose. This change in
policy has ultimately limited access by the associated
stipulation that none of the touring terrain can be opened
until all areas within the extensive forecast regionare con-
sidered to have a low avalanchehazard.
Three avalanche events have been documented in the
touring areas. No fatalities have occurred as a result of
these events. One skier was seriously injured in an event
which occurred in 1969 and a skier caught in a slide in
1992 was buried and rescued with the aid of a ski patrol
dog withoutsignificantinjury. Numerous incidentsof users
sliding or falling into cliff areashave occurredand several
have resulted in serious injury or death.

FUTURE ACCESS MANAGEMENT ISSUES

Recent increases in the number of tourers and changes in
user habits have been observed. A discussion of some of
these changesfollows.
Former access management considered the quality of
the skiing and users were requested to leave the
backcountry during spring conditions when corn snow
became too soft and ski surfaces were scarredwith tracks.
This policy resulted in exceptional early morning corn
skiing during extendedperiods of spring high barometric
pressureand encouraged users to leave the area before the
hazard associated with daily warming became a threat.
Some of today's snowboarders and skiers are content to
remain in the backcountry well after the warm-up has
occurred resulting in an exposure to the hazard from ava-
lanches and causing adverse impacts to the quality of ski-
ing.
The popularity of extreme skiing and snowboardinghas
resulted in the flocking of inexperiencedand experienced
masses to the extreme aspects of the touring areas. Con-
currently, anincreasingnumber of extremely skilled users
are demanding an open gate policy for the touring areas.
These people are extremely skilled in avalanche evalua-
tion, self rescue and route finding, and possess local
knowledge of the terrain. Some of these users have
organizedand are seekinglegal aid in aneffort to obtain an
open gate policy and to address violation issues.
During the past several years it has become very popu-
lar to access the touring area when it is closed. Skiing
closed areas in Wyoming is a misdemeanor violation of
state law. Numerous undocumentedavalancheeventshave
resulted from these users. None of these avalanche events
have resulted in a fatality to date. Anonymous reports of
206
|
these events are sometimes communicated to the forecast
laboratory. These accounts have become an important
source of information for the backcountry forecasters. En-
forcement of the boundaries is the responsibility of the
JHSC and the TCSD, however the logistics and problems
associated with apprehending and persecuting violators
in avalancheterrainmake enforcementdifficult andcostly.
The presentconsensusof the Forest Service, the national
park, the Sheriff's Department and the ski resort are that
future management options are open for discussion but
options are likely to be limited by incident response limi-
tations, liability issues and the potential for a significant
number of fatalities.

SUMMARY

The increasein use of the alpinetouring areas andchanges
in users habits and demandsare factors which are likely to
have future influence upon the management policy for
public access to these areas. The potential for liability
associated with providing access to the areas has already
influenced management policy. The litigation potential
has resulted in revisions to the management plan which
have affected the manner in which avalanche hazard in-
formation is communicated to users. The popularity of
the alpine touring areas, changes in user habits and user
demands have also had an impact on the overall quality of
skiing and have necessitated management reviews which
have resulted in recent changesin access policy.
In the future, it is expected that injuries and fatalities
will occur in the touring areas simply as a result of the
increasing number of users, the premise that low hazard
does not mean that no hazard exists and the reality that
the low hazard forecast is in fact just a forecast. It is ex-
pected that incidents will occur when the touring areas
are closed, that theJHSC, GTNP and TCSD will be required
to response to an increasing number of incidents, that
public pressure for an open gate policy will continue and
that boundary enforcement is likely to become a signifi-
cant issue.
To address these issues public education with respect
to avalancheawarenessandself rescuecapabilitiesare nec-
essary.
Finally, the present management scenario places a
unique emphasis on the forecasting of the distinction be-
tween a moderate andlow hazarddesignation. Avalanche
activity within the forecast region versus time, snowpack
settlement versus time, temperature variations versus time,
deep slab instability considerations and recent meteoro-
logical trends are some of the parameters which are con-
sidered in making this evaluation. Although low hazard
is well defined the transition from the moderate to low
hazard designation is possibly slower than the transitions
from the higher hazardcategories. The BTNF forecastlabo-
ratory often uses the low to moderate designation during
the transition from moderate to low hazard.
|
 |